Sparkle Animals

Whenever someone makes an animal character that is oddly colored or marked, there's always going to be that one person who goes "OMG THAT NOT NATURAL COLORZ. U SPARKLY WEEABOO DUMFAEC."

:|

Excuse me? Where is this art law that says CARTOONS can't be unnaturally colored?
For years, Cartoon animals have been unnatural colors.
Examples? Stimpy, Blue, Buster Bunny, etc. The list goes on. Of course there's naturally colored cartoon animals, but it's not required for an animal cartoon to be naturally colored.

Most of the time, when people make these characters, they're from a different world anyway so it could very well be NATURAL on that world.

But here's something people don't realize: All the colors of the rainbow do appear naturally on animals.
There's blue frogs, birds, lizards, butterflies, etc.
Oh, and you know that gray looking color on cats and dogs that is called blue? It is a kind of blue.
Just because it doesn't appear naturally yet doesn't mean the colors can't exist on furry animals later.


So your whole 'That animal is unnaturally colored, it should not exist' is invalid.

Please, take the stick out of your ass and leave the art world. No one wants your stuck up and lame personality in the art community.

You may not want to hear the whole 'Creativity' story, but you know what? Screw you. Art is all about being creative and using our imagination. For you to say our imagination is wrong? Gtfo. Imagination can't be restricted to guidelines. It doesn't work that way.

DooblyDoo has shared her thoughts and had a talk.
But will you DooblyDoo or DoonblyDon't?